![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NO RELIGIOUS ARBITRATION
Hello Alia, Just a note to congratulate you and the members with whom you worked closely in pressuring the Ministry of the Attorney General to proclaim sections, 1, 2 and 4 of the Family Statute Law Amendment Act, 2006. I do feel that the dozens of letters and visits to MPPs by our Club members were significant in helping to bring about its enactment. It was an issue that struck a chord with our members as they saw how religious arbitration threatened women's equality and was particularly disadvantageous to marginalized women. I know from reading your response on the Family Arbitration Draft Regulations that you would like to see them undergo further revision, but I do agree with the decision to see them move ahead as they appear. I have recently seen this happen in the drafting of the legislative framework of the Great Lakes Charter Annex Agreement, 2005 (GLCAA). I would imagine that some consolation in accepting the regulations as they appear now, is that there will be the opportunity to revisit them in two years time. The same has happened with the GLCAA. Your expertise, along with that of Bonnie Diamond, Pam Cross and others, has been in a very significant way, responsible for a historic achievement in separating family law decisions from religion in Ontario. It has been a great experience for Ontario Council to have been a part of this achievement through the contributions of Edeltraud and our members. All of us in Ontario Council look forward to the role that we can assume in the near future as a part of the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) Reference Group. Again, my congratulations to everyone and the best of luck in all that lies ahead. Sincerely, Linda MacGregor President, CFUW Ontario Council April 5, 2007 April 5, 2007 April 4, 2007 Mar. 20, 2007 March 15, 2007 February 19th, 2007 From Sept. 2006, Dates & Data Women and Religious Arbitration in Family Law – a follow up: It has been just a year since the Ontario Government listened to the will of its citizens, in particular women’s groups, and saw its way to ban binding (religious) arbitration in family law matters. The existing 1991 Arbitration Act law seriously disadvantaged women in family law matters, and if extended to include further religious tribunals had the potential to create serious inequality for a greater number of vulnerable women before the law. CFUW Clubs in Ontario and CFUW/ Ontario Council as part of the No Religious Arbitration Coalition had worked hard to bring about that change. The necessary amendments to the existing 1991 Arbitration Act and to related legislation was put through the Ontario Legislature and the resulting Family Statute Law Amendment Act 2005 received Royal Assent last spring. In its own policy on the matter, CFUW recognized that legislation alone would not be enough to empower and give equal access to the law. CFUW therefore urged “the Government of Canada and all provincial and territorial governments of Canada to ensure that all residents of Canada are made cognizant of their rights and responsibilities under family law legislation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. The Ontario Government indeed has made available funds for a women’s family law education and outreach project. CFUW/ Ontario Council represented by Joan Dunn and Teri Shaw, has been attending consultations initiated by the Ontario Women’s Directorate. Several women’s groups who have been instrumental in the no religious arbitration battle have formed a consortium to tackle the complex task of developing legal education resources that are legally correct in plain language, culturally and linguistically appropriate and in a format and location where vulnerable women can easily access them. CFUW/Ontario Council is part of that consortium along with groups such as the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, YWCA Toronto, METRAC, NAWL, CLEO, that have expertise and proven track record in large scale public legal education and legal services in the area of violence against women and family law as well as in the efficient administration of large budgets. The consortium has proposed a plan of action to the government. We shall keep Clubs posted on the progress of this project and on the role Clubs and CFUW/Ontario Council will be able to take on in it. - Edeltraud Neal May 12th, 2006 CFUW/Ontario Council joins the Public Legal Education and Community Outreach Project, with other members of the No Religious Arbitration Coalition, which will develop legal education resources with reference to family law. Members can go to www.ywcatoronto.ca/advocate_change/arbitration_intro.htm for more information about this. February 23,2006 The Family Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 incorporating changes to the Arbitration Act 1991, has received Royal Assent. Feb. 3, 2006 From the Pre-Budget Brief: CFUW/Ontario Council believes that all who live in Ontario, regardless of their culture, language, or faith, should have equal access to the resolution of family disputes within the parameters and protections of the Family Law Act. No group, or member within that group, should be disadvantaged by lack of knowledge of their rights and responsibilities under Canadian law CFUW/Ontario Council is a member of the No Religious Arbitration Coalition that has been actively opposing the concept of religious arbitration in family law. We commend the Government’s decision to end all religious arbitration in family law disputes. We note however, that Bill 57 does not provide for legal aid, which is essential if quality advice is to be received. CFUW/Ontario Council is very concerned that economically vulnerable women will not have the funds to pursue that legal advice. The lack of legal aid for family law means that many women do not have equitable access to justice. We are pleased that, in concert with Bill 27, Community Outreach and Education Programs are being developed by the Ontario Women’s Directorate and the Ministry of Community and Social Services to increase legal literacy and make all Ontarians understand their rights under Canadian and Ontario family law and family law arbitrations. December 14, 2005 Comments are submitted by CFUW/Ontario Council on the Proposed Bill 27, The Family Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 to the Standing Committee on Justice Policy. This Bill includes the amendments to the Arbitration Act 1991 that we, as part of the No Religious Arbitration Committee, have been arguing for. September 13, 2005 A Press Release is sent by CFUW/Ontario Council commending the decision of Premier Dalton McGuinty and his government not to allow religious arbitration in the dispute resolution of family law matters. September 2005 We continue to express our concerns very strongly about potential changes to the Arbitration Act. Summer 2005 Ontario CFUW members, family and friends voice their opinion re: family law matters in the Arbitration Act to their MPPs. May 31, 2005 CFUW/Ontario Council together with the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL), Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) and the Toronto YWCA meet with the Liberal Women's Caucus of the Ontario Legislature concerning Marion Boyd’s Arbitration Act Review. Mar. 31, 2005 CFUW/Ontario Council is concerned about the Boyd Review. See a copy of our brief. Jan. 15, 2005 At the January Standing Committee, Hon. Marion Boyd, Chair of the Arbitration Act Review Committee, Nuzhat Jafri of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women and Annie Bunting, Professor in the Law and Society Program at York University gave their views on the proposed revisions to Ontario’s Arbitration Act. External links: YWCA Toronto’s page on Arbitration Hon. Marion Boyd’s report, Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusionwww.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd
|
||||||||||||||||||||||